| e of Enfield All bets accepted subject to our rules. | | | | not know how to lay their money out in the most |
| Stakes: Selection: Time: | | | | effective way. Almost all wagers can be re-written |
| Silver Lily AS 1400 | | | | more punter-friendly, with no additional outlay. My page |
| Golden Lily AS 1700 | | | | one example wager cannot be improved upon, and if |
| £1 WIN both selections D-S-A | | | | adhered to religiously, your local bookie will soon be |
| Stake: | | | | requesting you to take your business elsewhere! |
| £2 : p | | | | D-S-A wagers can't be successfully "hedged". The Big |
| Dear Punter, | | | | Three uk book makers will not accept a D-S-A from a |
| The above perfectly legal wager is the one that ALL | | | | fellow bookie. All three will accept them from shop or |
| bookmakers dislike layying. It's a very punter friendly | | | | credit punters, but only for nominal stakes. |
| wager and always only grudgingly accepted, because | | | | Once they have taken the example wager on |
| fortunately for us, bookmaking in The UK is very | | | | page-one, all any manager can do, hedging-wise, is this: |
| competitive. | | | | £1 win double S.L. and G.L. - if lose S.L. then |
| After GOLDEN LILY was a winning horse, the bookie | | | | £1 w G.L. £2 staked. This is fine if both |
| is allowing an additonal £2 of winnings to revert | | | | win and it's OK if S.L. loses and G.L. wins, BUT, if S.L. |
| onto SILVER LlLY, which has already won almost | | | | wins at say 14/1 and G.L. loses, then the shop have |
| three hours previously. Stumble upon two winners and | | | | lost almost £12 attempting to win £2. Add |
| the bookie is generously granting a £6 wager | | | | a few noughts and you can easily see how they can |
| for a £2 stake. My advice is to change betting | | | | fall into the brown 'n smelly! |
| shops after a pair of nice priced winners - and ditto | | | | If the D-S-A doesn't improve your punting-winnings, |
| after the next pair! DOUBLE-STAKES-ABOUT | | | | then your method of selection requires abandoning and |
| (D-S-A) wagers, will alas only cover two selections but | | | | not the wager. |
| can be used on all anti-post bets, often with months | | | | Most horse winners are in the 3/1 to 14/I price-band |
| between actual races - hows that then? | | | | and I suggest you restrict your selections to this |
| With all multiple bets (Yankees, Heinzs, Canadians etc) | | | | price-range. Some horses at 10/1 have wonderful |
| winnings travel "only" forward. You may believe that | | | | chances of winning, but a greyhound at this price has |
| when you eventually stumble upon four winning Favs in | | | | little chance of winning and should be avoided. Don't |
| a Yankee, that winnings from the third and fourth | | | | consider dogs priced over 6/1 or horses over 6/1 in |
| selection have re-verted onto selections one end two | | | | small fields (3-6 runners). Finally, always remember it is |
| - but this is "not" so. | | | | "only" D-S-A users, that can manipulate 2 points onto |
| Many shrewd punters sit in a betting shop and do | | | | the winner of the first-race, five minutes after the |
| race-by-race win Yankees or Place Only (TOTE) | | | | winner of the final-race of the day has weighed-in. |
| Yankees. This enables them to take a board price | | | | Please give the D-S-A wager a long and fair trial. It's |
| about selections 2, 3, and 4 in a win Yankee etc. | | | | the sole reason I've made the horses pay for the past |
| Race-by-race win and Place-Only mult-iple wagers, | | | | five decades. |
| would be impossible to do, if winnings or stakes were | | | | My most successful, profitable approach is to select |
| to reverse. | | | | five horses (never dogs) and to do any pair (10). Thus: |
| No UK book maker will accept a place-only Multiple | | | | "any pair (10), 1pt win both selections. D-S-A. A line is |
| wager, yet most will accept 8 "place only" Single, at | | | | drawn under the instructions and 20pts are entered |
| Tote odds. Why not sit in a betting shop and do a | | | | into the "stake box" (choose your own stakes). In the |
| "place only", Three Doubles and a Treble? Simp1y | | | | event of three 4/1 winners (from five), not impossible, |
| place three points on the first selection and reserve | | | | the pre-tax return is 96pts. This is almost 4/1 to your |
| one-point for selection two end write "place only" on | | | | outlay (96/100ths of 4/1) for being only 3/5ths correct. |
| both wagers. If selection-one is placed, place the total | | | | This is far easier than "banking" on one of the five and |
| return (plus the set-aside one-point), onto selection-two; | | | | sploshing on 20pts - and praying! |
| DEDUCT1NG one-third of one's return, for I and 3 | | | | The 96pts are arrived at thus: 6 x 1pt singles at 4/1 = |
| place double. If selection two is placed, remove the | | | | 30pts. 6 x 2pt singles at 4/1 (less 2pts each single) = |
| place-double (I and 2) and place everything onto | | | | 48pts. 6 x 1pt singles (all three winners x both losers) |
| selection-three. If selection-three is placed, the return | | | | less 2pts each single = 18pts. A 7/1 winner and four |
| will yield two one-point place doubles and a one-point | | | | losers yields a pre-tax 24pts (8pts, less 2pts, x 4). |
| treble. When selection-two is unplaced, remember to | | | | Four or five decent priced winning horses and you'll |
| put on the 1 and 3 place-double. | | | | require a barrow - and a change of shops! This is a |
| There is no way whatsoever you can sit in a betting | | | | perfectly legal wager and most betting shops now use |
| shop and do a race-by-race D-S-A wager. You can | | | | automatic calculating machines. Whereby the S.P. |
| sit there for ever, without improving it. One of the main | | | | stake and wager are fed in to the machine and at the |
| reasons that horse racing bookies rarely go bust (or | | | | press of a button, the machine settles the wager - tax |
| ride push bikes!), is the sad fact that most punters do | | | | paid or unpaid. |